A Rejection Mindset: Selection Overload in Internet Dating

A Rejection Mindset: Selection Overload in Internet Dating

A Rejection Mindset: Selection Overload in Internet Dating

Article Information

Tila M. Pronk is Assistant Professor at Tilburg University. Her work centers on intimate relationships. For instance, she studies (online) dating and forgiveness, as well due to the fact effect of specific differences like self-control on relationships.

Jaap J. A. Denissen is Professor at Tilburg University. His work centers on the user interface between character therapy, social therapy, and psychology that is developmental. Broadly, he studies deals between people and their environment.

Managing Editor: Vivian Zyas

Tila M. Pronk, Tilburg University, Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 225, 5037 DB Tilburg, the Netherlands. E-mail: email protected


The paradox of contemporary relationship is the fact that online platforms offer more opportunities to look for a intimate partner than before, but individuals are nonetheless prone to be solitary. We hypothesized the presence of a rejection mindset: The access that is continued practically limitless prospective lovers makes individuals more pessimistic and rejecting. Across three studies, individuals straight away started initially to reject more hypothetical and real lovers when dating online, cumulating an average of in a decrease of 27per cent in opportunity on acceptance through the first towards the final partner option. This is explained by a complete decrease in satisfaction with photos and observed dating success. For females, the rejection mindset additionally led to a likelihood that is decreasing of intimate matches. Our findings claim that people slowly “close down” from mating possibilities whenever dating that is online.

The landscape that is dating changed drastically in the last ten years, with increased and more individuals searching for a partner online (Hobbs, Owen, & Gerber, 2017). Folks have never had the opportunity to pick lovers among this kind of enormous pool of choices. The 10 million active daily users of the popular online dating application Tinder are on average presented with 140 partner options a day (Smith, 2018) as an example. The opposite has occurred: The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, 2019; Copen, Daniels, Vespa, & Mosher, 2012; DePaulo, 2017) while one may expect this drastic increase in mating opportunities to result in an increasing number of romantic relationships. What could explain this paradox in contemporary relationship?

The abundance of preference in online dating sites is amongst the factors that are key describes its success (Lenton & Stewart, 2008). Individuals like having several choices to select from, while the possibility of finding an alternative that matches someone’s preference that is individual logically increase with increased option (Lancaster, 1990; Patall, Cooper, & Robinson, 2008). Nonetheless, having choice that is extensive have different undesireable effects, such as for instance paralysis (for example., not making any choice at all) and reduced satisfaction (Iyengar & Lepper, 2000; Scheibehenne, Greifeneder, & Todd, 2010; Schwartz, 2004). In reality, it would appear that individuals generally experience less advantages when they usually have more option. This observation is similar to the essential financial principle of diminishing returns (Brue, 1993; Shephard & Fare, 1974), for which each device this is certainly sequentially included with the production process leads to less profits.

There is certainly some evidence that is indirect having more option into the domain of dating also offers negative effects. As an example, when expected to select the partner that is best, use of more partner pages led to more re searching, more hours allocated to assessing bad option choices, and a diminished odds of choosing the possibility aided by the best individual fit (Wu & Chiou, 2009). Likewise, whenever a selection set increases, individuals wind up being less pleased with their ultimate partner choice and prone to reverse their choice (D’Angelo & Toma, 2017). The undesireable effects of preference overload are mentioned in articles in popular media mentioning phenomena such as “Tinder tiredness” (Beck, 2016) or burnout that is“dating (Blair, 2017).

To shed more light from the paradoxical aftereffects of contemporary relationship, we learned what goes on once people enter a dating environment that is online. Our design that is innovative allowed to see or watch exactly exactly just how people’s partner alternatives unfold whenever individuals are served with partner options sequentially—as in opposition to https://datingmentor.org/omgchat-review/ simultaneously (D’Angelo & Toma, 2017; Wu & Chiou, 2009). Our primary expectation had been that online dating sites will set a rejection mind-set off, leading people to be increasingly more likely to reject lovers to your degree they have been served with more choices. Next, we explored the concern of timing: just exactly just How quickly will the rejection mindset kick in? We didn’t have any a priori theory on which a choice that is ideal will be but alternatively explored a prospective “break point” into the propensity to reject. 3rd, we tested which emotional procedures may account fully for improvement in mating decisions.

The Present Analysis

The existence was tested by us of the rejection mind-set in online dating sites across three studies. In research 1, we provided people who have images of hypothetical lovers, to evaluate if as soon as people’s choice that is general would change. In research 2, we offered individuals with photos of lovers that have been really available and tested the development that is gradual of option actions along with their rate of success with regards to shared interest (i.e., fits). In learn 3, we explored possible underlying emotional mechanisms. Particularly, as well as in line with option literature that is overload we explored if the rejection mind-set might be as a result of individuals experiencing lower choice satisfaction much less success during the period of online dating sites. As a goal that is additional we explored the possible moderating part of sex. In every studies, we dedicated to individuals between 18 and three decades group that is old—a accocunts for 79% of all of the users of internet dating applications (Smith, 2018).


Forgotten Password?